Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aging Research results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 45.6% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 369 faulty-reasoning hits from 171 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (410 of 16,562 topics). This Aging Research is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Aging Research
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 171
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510097.5% percentile
16.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles171 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 45.6%45.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 35.1%35.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 35.1%35.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 17.5%17.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 17.5%17.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.5%17.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 45.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 35.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 35.1%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos