Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Agentic Ai results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 408 hits. Analysis detected 2,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,372 of 16,463 topics). This Agentic Ai is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Agentic Ai
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,752
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.8%14.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos