Topic summary
46% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ageing results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,998 hits . Analysis detected 15,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,936 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (13,860 of 15,447 topics). This Ageing is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Ageing
Topic details
Total words: 19,936
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles19.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst