Topic summary
⁠24%1 analyzed article/video704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Affordable Housing Crisis results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 1,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,553 of 16,562 topics). This Affordable Housing Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Affordable Housing Crisis
Topic details
Total words: 2,816
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.3% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos