Topic summary
⁠71%3 analyzed articles/videos2,786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Affordability Crisis results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 2,095 hits. Analysis detected 12,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,650 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,546 of 15,383 topics). This Affordability Crisis is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Affordability Crisis
Topic details
Total words: 9,650
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.7%21.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.2%14.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos