Topic summary
⁠34%5 analyzed articles/videos1,882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aerospace Industry results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 691 hits. Analysis detected 6,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,747 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,294 of 15,765 topics). This Aerospace Industry is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Aerospace Industry
Topic details
Total words: 7,747
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos