Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adhd Treatment results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, False Dilemma, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 2,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,664 of 16,562 topics). This Adhd Treatment is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Adhd Treatment
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,628
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos