Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Academic Competition results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 244 hits . Analysis detected 1,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,083 of 15,320 topics). This Academic Competition is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group. Academic Competition
Topic details
Total words: 2,616
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst