Topic summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 2,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abuse In Religious Institutions results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 527 hits . Analysis detected 4,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,369 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,459 of 16,562 topics). This Abuse In Religious Institutions is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Abuse In Religious Institutions
Topic details
Total words: 6,369
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst