Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abrahamic NATO results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 415 hits. Analysis detected 2,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,260 of 16,102 topics). This Abrahamic NATO is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Abrahamic NATO
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 21.1%21.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 20.8%20.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos