Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,827 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Pills results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 731 hits. Analysis detected 7,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,308 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,884 of 16,562 topics). This Abortion Pills is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Abortion Pills
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,308
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos