Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abc results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 388 hits. Analysis detected 2,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,133 of 16,562 topics). This Abc is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Abc
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠63%Abc (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos