Topic summary
⁠11%6 analyzed articles/videos4,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 3d Printing results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 1,298 hits. Analysis detected 12,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,960 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (15,098 of 15,753 topics). This 3d Printing is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
3d Printing
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751004.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles20K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos