Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,040 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 18th Century French Literature results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,015 hits. Analysis detected 7,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,513 of 16,562 topics). This 18th Century French Literature is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
18th Century French Literature
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠43%18th Century French Literature (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 8,160
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.0%11.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.4%12.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos