Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These 18th And Vine District results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,164 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,753 topics). This 18th And Vine District is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
18th And Vine District
Topic details
Total words: 1,580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos