Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video52.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoe Taggart results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 78.4% saturation with 51.75 hits. Analysis detected 214.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,472 of 28,364 speakers). This Zoe Taggart is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Zoe Taggart
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 52.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 78.4%78.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 78.4%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos