Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zeeshan Aleem results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 261 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 78.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,003 of 26,925 speakers). This Zeeshan Aleem is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Zeeshan Aleem
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
78.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos