Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video48.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zane Memeger results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 61.7% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 48.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,211 of 28,364 speakers). This Zane Memeger is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Zane Memeger
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 48.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
31.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos48.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 61.7%61.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 33.3%33.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 61.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos