Speaker summary
59%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zaher Ibrahim results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 52 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 65% (10,128 of 28,364 speakers). This Zaher Ibrahim is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Zaher Ibrahim
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos26 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos