Speaker summary
79%1 analyzed article/video32.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zachery Palmer results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Recency Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 84.5% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 113.974 faulty-reasoning hits from 32.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 73.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (6,914 of 35,766 speakers). This Zachery Palmer is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Zachery Palmer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
81%Zachery Palmer (selected)74%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 32.667
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
73.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos32.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 92.2%92.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 84.5%84.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 92.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 84.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 7.5%Recency BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos