Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video132.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zach Jackson results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 77.1% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 326 faulty-reasoning hits from 132.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,176 of 28,364 speakers). This Zach Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Zach Jackson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠33%Zach Jackson (selected)21%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 132.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.4% percentile
20.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos132.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 77.1%77.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 30.5%30.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.5%10.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 77.1%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos