Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yvanna Cancela results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 281.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,987 of 28,364 speakers). This Yvanna Cancela is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Yvanna Cancela
Speaker details
Total words: 73.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.9% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos