Speaker summary
54%2 analyzed articles/videos772 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yun Wang results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 1,249.383 faulty-reasoning hits from 772 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,559 of 28,364 speakers). This Yun Wang is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Yun Wang
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 772
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.8% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos772 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate