Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video211 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yolanda Fernandez results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 161 faulty-reasoning hits from 211 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,848 of 28,364 speakers). This Yolanda Fernandez is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Yolanda Fernandez
Speaker details
Total words: 211
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos211 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos