Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video77.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yoko Fujihara results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Nature, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 39.375 hits. Analysis detected 206.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 77.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,785 of 28,364 speakers). This Yoko Fujihara is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Yoko Fujihara
Speaker details
Total words: 77.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.4% percentile
27.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos77.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 53.5%53.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.7%26.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.9%12.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 53.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 0.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos