Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video47.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yoel Guzansky results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Slippery Slope, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 68.3% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 178.515 faulty-reasoning hits from 47.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,413 of 26,848 speakers). This Yoel Guzansky is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Yoel Guzansky
Speaker details
Total words: 47.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.4% percentile
54.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos47.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 68.3%68.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 57.9%57.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 68.3%68.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.8%15.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 68.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 68.3%, sitewide 26.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 57.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos