Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yassamin Ansari results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 98 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 71% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,785 of 28,364 speakers). This Yassamin Ansari is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Yassamin Ansari
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
71.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 56.5%56.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 56.5%56.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 56.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos