Speaker summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yasmin Trudeau results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 48.976 hits. Analysis detected 219.873 faulty-reasoning hits from 182 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,457 of 28,364 speakers). This Yasmin Trudeau is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Yasmin Trudeau
Speaker details
Total words: 182
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.2% percentile
9.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos182 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Middle Ground: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos