Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video97.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Xin Tian results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Anecdotal, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 40.1% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 334.036 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,321 of 28,364 speakers). This Xin Tian is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Xin Tian
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 97.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
26.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos97.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 40.1%40.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.6%32.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.0%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos