Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video198.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Witt Yao results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Indoctrination, and False Dilemma, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 759.101 faulty-reasoning hits from 198.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,326 of 28,364 speakers). This Witt Yao is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Witt Yao
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠22%Witt Yao (selected)15%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 198.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.3% percentile
14.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos198.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.0%26.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 27.2%27.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.0%15.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 8.1%Straw Man: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Special Pleading: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos