Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video124.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Winnie Kao results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 72.1% saturation with 99.882 hits. Analysis detected 330.113 faulty-reasoning hits from 124.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,342 of 28,364 speakers). This Winnie Kao is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Winnie Kao
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 124.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
42.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos124.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 72.1%72.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.9%60.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.5%38.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Slippery Slope: Speaker 72.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos