Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wingmate results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,715 of 28,364 speakers). This Wingmate is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Wingmate
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 30
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos