Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Willie Fritz results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 127.377 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,315 of 28,364 speakers). This Willie Fritz is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Willie Fritz
Speaker details
Total words: 150
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.2% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos150 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 19.5%19.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos