Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Canby results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Anecdotal, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 29 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,701 of 28,364 speakers). This William Canby is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
William Canby
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos