Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Harper results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Status Quo Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 148 faulty-reasoning hits from 74 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,099 of 28,364 speakers). This Will Harper is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Will Harper
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 74
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos74 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos