Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Western officials and analysts results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Burden of Proof, and Confirmation Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,671 of 28,364 speakers). This Western officials and analysts is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Western officials and analysts
Speaker details
Total words: 30
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510083.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos