Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video105.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wazir Osman results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 21.375 hits. Analysis detected 84.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 105.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,530 of 28,364 speakers). This Wazir Osman is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Wazir Osman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 105.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510013.5% percentile
11.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos105.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos