Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video77 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington officials results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 39 faulty-reasoning hits from 77 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,931 of 28,364 speakers). This Washington officials is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Washington officials
Speaker details
Total words: 77
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
16.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos77 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos