Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Warren results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 72% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 321 faulty-reasoning hits from 164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,986 of 28,364 speakers). This Warren is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Warren
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠51%Warren (selected)33%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.7% percentile
32.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos164 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 72.0%72.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 51.8%51.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 72.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 51.8%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos