Speaker summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos168.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wally Zimolong results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 458.56 faulty-reasoning hits from 168.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,528 of 28,364 speakers). This Wally Zimolong is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Wally Zimolong
Speaker details
Total words: 168.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.1% percentile
12.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos168.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.1%18.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos