Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wale results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 105 faulty-reasoning hits from 57 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 46.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,696 of 28,364 speakers). This Wale is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Wale
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 57
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
46.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos57 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 47.4%47.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos