Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video179 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia's Joint Legislative and Audit Review Commission (JLARC) results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Composition/Division, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50.3% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 394 faulty-reasoning hits from 179 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,355 of 28,364 speakers). This Virginia's Joint Legislative and Audit Review Commission (JLARC) is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Virginia's Joint Legislative and Audit Review Commission (JLARC)
Speaker details
Total words: 179
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
31.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos179 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.3%50.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.2%35.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.5%14.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.3%, sitewide 11.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 35.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos