Speaker summary
56%1 analyzed article/video294.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vincent Yang results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 520.615 faulty-reasoning hits from 294.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,059 of 28,364 speakers). This Vincent Yang is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Vincent Yang
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 294.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.7% percentile
10.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos294.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos