Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video76.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vincent Staupe results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Blind-Spot Bias, Burden of Proof, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 76.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,073 of 28,364 speakers). This Vincent Staupe is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Vincent Staupe
Speaker details
Total words: 76.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos76.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos