Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video26.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vincent Seminerio results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Recency Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 26.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,072 of 28,364 speakers). This Vincent Seminerio is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Vincent Seminerio
Speaker details
Total words: 26.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos26.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos