Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vincent Perez results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Negativity Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,071 of 28,364 speakers). This Vincent Perez is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Vincent Perez
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos