Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vince Perez results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Burden of Proof, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 74.5% saturation with 94.627 hits. Analysis detected 338.627 faulty-reasoning hits from 127 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,878 of 28,364 speakers). This Vince Perez is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Vince Perez
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 127
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
44.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos127 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 74.5%74.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 24.5%24.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.5%24.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 74.5%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos