Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vince Gabbert results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 64.7% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 51 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,070 of 28,364 speakers). This Vince Gabbert is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Vince Gabbert
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 64.7%64.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 35.3%35.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 64.7%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 35.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos