Speaker summary
52% 1 analyzed article/video 205.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Viliuia Choinova results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Indoctrination , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 43.824 hits . Analysis detected 396.556 faulty-reasoning hits from 205.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,428 of 28,364 speakers). This Viliuia Choinova is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Viliuia Choinova
Speaker details
Total words: 205.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 9.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos205.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst