Speaker summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Copeland results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 207 faulty-reasoning hits from 79 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 87.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,711 of 26,731 speakers). This Victoria Copeland is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Victoria Copeland

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
87.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos79 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 81.0%81.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 81.0%81.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 81.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 81.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos